Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 08/2004

Texas BlogWire

April 21, 2008

Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Restoration Act

Here is a bill I've been keeping a close eye on for nearly a year:

Under a measure sponsored by Senator Edward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, the court’s ruling that Ms. [Lilly] Ledbetter [of Alabama] failed to file a timely challenge to pay practices at a Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. plant in Gadsden would effectively be overturned, though Ms. Ledbetter would not benefit directly.

Ms. Ledbetter, who earned thousands of dollars less than male colleagues doing similar supervisory work, was found by the court to have failed to make her claim within 180 days of the company’s pay policy decision. The sponsors of the bill want to clear up that requirement and straighten out what they see as a flawed ruling.

“Never mind that Ms. Ledbetter didn’t know about the discrimination when it first began,” Mr. Kennedy said. “Never mind that she had no means to learn of the discrimination because Goodyear kept salary information confidential. Never mind that Goodyear’s discrimination against Ms. Ledbetter continued each and every time it gave her a smaller paycheck than it gave her male colleagues.”

The House passed a similar bill last year soon after the court decision, but its backers have encountered resistance in the Senate and from the Bush administration, which argues it could spark a wave of lawsuits. Some Senate Republicans have reservations about the measure, but they intend to be careful in their opposition to avoid being portrayed as backing pay discrimination.



April 12, 2008

New corporate giveaway under guise of "fixing" the mortgage crisis

I am of mixed opinions of how or even whether to assist people and banks that got involved in the overinflated housing market over the last few years.  But one thing I am clear about is that giving out billions of dollars of taxpayers' money to the housing industry that reaped in mega-profits during those years is profoundly wrong.

Daniel Gross wrote in Slate last Monday (emphasis added):

The proposed tax break [now passed by the Senate] is hard to justify for several reasons. It does nothing for slow and steady companies that keep their heads and simply rack up profits year after year—and pay their taxes accordingly. Rather, it rewards the most reckless participants in the bubble. If you borrowed a ton of money to build spec houses in Miami and reported $2 billion in profits between 2002 and 2007 but gave up all those profits by notching a $2 billion loss this year, the extended carryback has a great deal of value. If you've been building affordable housing in Wichita, Kan., and booked $300 million in profits in those years, and then, through careful management of costs, managed to eke out a $5 million profit this year, it has no value. The big public homebuilders, whose shares rallied on the news of this potential tax break, didn't pay any windfall taxes on the bubble-era earnings. Why should they get an extraordinary post-bubble windfall?

Homebuilders argue that they need relief because their sector, which provides a great deal of domestic employment, is on the ropes, and they're finding it more difficult to raise capital. Which is as it should be. After bubbles pop, those who screwed up really badly fail and get taken over by creditors or opportunistic investors. Those who have sound underlying franchises but merely got a little carried away can survive if they take painful restructuring moves. This is what is known as market capitalism. For all the talk of a credit crunch, capital is still available—it's just not available on the easy terms managers had come to expect during the late Greenspan years. Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, and plenty of other firms tied to the mortgage/finance complex have taken steps to shore up their balance sheets and replenish lost capital. But investors, having been burned, demand more downside protection and better guaranteed returns. Thornburg Mortgage was forced to pay 18 percent interest for an emergency round of capital raising that allowed it to stave off bankruptcy. This is also what is known as market capitalism.

...

The proposal to give new tax breaks to homebuilders and banks is yet another example of the pernicious trend of privatizing profit and socializing losses, which is gnawing away at faith in the system. Dilute the shareholders, not the taxpayers.

Thankfully, the House of Representatives may take a far more sensible route, according to the Washington Post (emphasis added):

On Wednesday, the House Ways and Means Committee approved an $11 billion tax package that rejects help for home builders and offers a $7,500 tax credit to first-time home buyers rather than buyers of foreclosed properties.

Please keep paying attention so that we all do not get swindled in the end.

April 08, 2008

Cachao

Since I last posted here, the world lost one of our greatest musical influences of the last century. 

Israel Cachao López, the Cuban bassist and composer who was a pioneer of the mambo, died on Saturday in Coral Gables, Fla. He was 89 and lived in Coral Gables.

...

Cachao, as he was universally known, transformed the rhythm of Cuban music when he and his brother, the pianist and cellist Orestes López, extended and accelerated the final section of the stately Cuban danzón into the mambo. “My brother and I would say to each other, ‘Mambea, mambea ahí,’ which meant to add swing to that part,” he said in a 2006 interview with The Miami Herald. The springy mambo bass lines Cachao created in the late 1930’s — simultaneously driving and playful — became a foundation of modern Cuban music, of the salsa that grew out of it, and also of Latin-influenced rock ’n’ roll and rhythm-and-blues. For much of the 20th century, Cachao’s innovations set the world dancing.

In the late 1950’s, he brought another breakthrough to Latin music with descargas: late-night Havana jam sessions that merged Afro-Cuban rhythms, Cuban songs and the convolutions of jazz. The mixture of propulsion and exploration in those recordings has influenced salsa and jazz musicians ever since.

Here is a YouTube tribute, from CCSFMusic25.  The music is Cachao on bass and Paquito D'Rivera on clarinet:

And  Cachao - Ahora Si, courtesy of  winplayer86.

March 22, 2008

It literally rained mud here last Tuesday

Literally, mud fell from the sky here in San Antonio last Tuesday. 

I have no experience with that kind of weather phenomenon before, so I didn't know what to make of it.  My first impression upon seeing my car, after emerging from my office late that afternoon, was "My car is spattered in mud from top to bottom!  How did this happen?  Did some huge truck drive though a deep puddle at high speed?"  With no such large puddle nearby and thus no evidence that such a thing could have happened, I then noted that I had parked underneath a large live oak tree and that it is spring and rationalized that trees are messy in the spring. Then I promptly put it out of my mind, while driving to the nearest gas station to clean off the windows that I could barely see through.  There, some puzzlement  returned as I noted that the line for the car wash was six deep.

Daily life being full of distractions, and the concept of a muddy rain non-existent in my head, I once again forgot all about this, until, after a few days of no internet access thanks to a bad phone line, I read this article in the Express-News, titled, "Just ash with rain? Not so fast":

The strange stuff that fell Tuesday, griming up windows and lining the pockets of carwash owners, has had the additional effect of setting up a sort of meteorological whodunit.

Just what, some scientific sleuths want to know, commingled with the rain as it fell onto vehicles from San Antonio to Corpus Christi, from Austin to Houston?

Some initial reports, including one from a National Weather Service meteorologist, had the primary cause of the deposits as ash from wildfires in Mexico.

Other indications, including satellite photos, showed a dust plume also emerging from central Mexico.    

Another additive to the mix washed from the sky by the rain of a fast-moving cold front may have been particles from bone-dry West Texas.

...

Forrest Mims III, a science consultant and a freelance columnist for the Express-News, took a sample of the stuff from his window and put it under the microscope, forwarding some of his findings to TCEQ.

"There's one black spore and there are three possible soot particles and everything else is dirt, dust, sand. I would say that it's probably less than 1 percent smoke, and that's being generous," he said.

Joe Baskin, the weather service meteorologist who initially thought that what blew over here was mostly smoke since that's what it looked like in photos, said another look indicated that it likely was dust. (The weather service isn't responsible for investigating the stuff once it leaves clouds.)

    

David Gay, acting director of the Illinois-based National Atmospheric Deposition Program, said his government-funded network of researchers had five sample sites in South Texas and would be able to review initial findings as early as next week.

To me and, I suspect, most others here, it is much more plausible that the stuff in the rain was dust and not ash, as was apparently first reported.  The brownish, rusty color of the residue just does not fit the concept of dull gray ash.

So what is going on in west Texas or northern Mexico that their dirt is falling on our city?

March 17, 2008

Geoengineering: Rolling the dice with the only planet we've got

If "geoengineering" is truly becoming a mainstream concept, as suggested by Chris Mooney at the Intersection (based on a recent mention in Time magazine), then we are truly on a dangerous path.

Time writes, "Geoengineering has long been the province of kooks, but as the difficulty of reducing greenhouse-gas emissions has become harder to ignore, it is slowly emerging as an option of last resort."

Are we already reduced to thinking about last resorts?   If we ever reach the point that we have to say, Let's purposefully try to mess up our planet's extremely complicated climate system in order to restore a poorly understood equilibrium that we lost a while back," then we are truly f****d. 

We don't have a planet to practice on.  We've never done anything like that before.  What are the odds it would work as intended?

If we reach that point, it's far worse than the equivalent of a Hail Mary pass at the end of a football game, or pulling the goalie at the end of a hockey game.  After all, those strategies have been tried before and we know they can work, if rarely.  In the case of geongineering, it won't work.  To even think of attempting it is to think that we're doomed anyway so we might as well have some fun on the way out.

We're not there yet, thankfully, so let's send the talk of geoengineering back to the science fiction books where it belongs.

Photos from Luminaria festival Saturday night

Here are a few of my photos from the first Luminaria arts and music festival, downtown San Antonio, Saturday, March 15, 2008.   There was way too much going on to come close to seeing and doing all I wanted to.  If the city this again (and I sure hope they do), perhaps they could split it up into a couple weekend evenings, instead of just one.  It was a blast. 

Towerlights Greenstreet
Bluecrowd Crowdlights
Pinkorchestra Henryjudy
Rainbowalamo

March 15, 2008

Luminaria: new music and arts festival in San Antonio today and tonight

For those living in and near San Antonio, a new music and arts festival that is taking place today and tonight may be of interest.  It is called Luminaria.  Here is the description:

Luminaria is the first annual all day and evening celebration of San Antonio premiere artists and art organizations giving citizens of the community a chance to experience the city’s diverse cultures through observing and participating in our world-class artistic heritage. Through visual, performing, multi-media, theatre, dance, music and other artistic forms, audiences will be engaged throughout San Antonio in a free, world-class celebration of the arts.

Luminaria is intended to be a cohesive celebration of the arts through a creative atmosphere showcasing San Antonio’s diverse artistic community.

An artist-driven celebration of the arts, Luminaria is an unprecedented collaboration of over 40 non-profit organizations that will come together for 1 day to celebrate the dynamic vitality of San Antonio’s creative spirit.

Based on the success of other international celebrations such as Nuit Blanche in Paris and Noche Blanca in Madrid, no other city in Texas has attempted to coordinate continuous artistic, educational and innovative programming for a city-wide arts celebration. To further highlight the name of this event, the traditional role of the luminaria is a clever small light that conjures up creative ideas which inspires waves of innovation.

Here is a list of events taking place downtown from 6pm to midnight tonight.  It is an impressive list that includes six venues for performances.  I just found out about this festival, but hopefully will get a chance to catch part of this tonight.  It looks like great fun.

For more, here is an article in the Express-News about the festival.

March 14, 2008

Christmas Mountains: Texas GOP still trying to sell off more public land

Our GOP administration in Texas continues its assault on the concept of public lands.  They haven't had much success lately, but they keep trying.  This time, it is Land Commissioner Jerry Patterson, who for months has been doing his best to try to sell off 9,000+ acres of land out in the spectacular west Texas desert into private hands. 

This land, in the Christmas Mountains adjacent to Big Bend National Park, was donated to the state by a conservation group back in the early 1990s.  Once Patterson decided last year that it must be sold, the National Park Service stepped in to propose purchasing it and taking it off the state of Texas's hands.  But Patterson now appears to be refusing to consider the Park Service proposal.

The Fort Worth Star-Telegram has an update:

AUSTIN -- Texas Land Commissioner Jerry Patterson continues to block a proposal that could put the Christmas Mountains into the hands of the National Park Service, conservationists complained this week.

Patterson, who is chairman of the School Land Board, which has authority over the Christmas Mountains, has so far declined to bring up for board consideration a park service proposal to add the mountains to Big Bend National Park.

Patterson, who drew criticism for his recent attempts to sell the property to private interests, raised eyebrows last week when he told an audience in Fort Worth that "Big Bend National Park doesn't want" the Christmas Mountains.

Conservationist Luke Metzger likened Patterson's stance to "blocking democracy."

"To prevent the proposal from at least being considered -- I think that's outrageous," said Metzger, director of Environment Texas. "It's a failure of government for him to not to even allow the case from being made to the full land board."

The three-member board has met three times since the federal agency made its proposal Jan. 31, and another meeting is scheduled for March 18. The park service's proposed management plan for the Christmas Mountains has not been put on any of the meeting agendas.

A spokesman for Patterson did not respond to questions about the land commissioner's plans. However, in a statement that he posted this week on the Star-Telegram's PoliTex blog, Patterson indicated that he did not want to transfer the property to the park service -- at least for the moment -- and that he is still considering selling the mountains to a private bidder, which he has said can act as a good steward of the property.

For more on the Christmas Mountains story, see jobsanger and Capitol Annex.

March 05, 2008

"Where were you all last time?"

The line of the night, from the precinct chair at our Democratic precinct convention (aka "caucus") last night, addressing the (guessing) 200 or so attendees in an elementary school cafeteria:

Where were you all last time we had one of these things, when we had like four people!

March 01, 2008

Three photos from the Obama rally last night

These are not the greatest images, but they are the best I managed to acquire from my distance and in the available lighting.  Obama's "Stand for Change" rally, February 29 2008, San Antonio TX:

Obama1Obama2



Obama3

Obama and Clinton both in San Antonio last night

A few days ago, I noticed that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were planning rallies in San Antonio for the weekend.  I was hoping to attend both of them -- after all, it is pretty rare that my state is involved in such a heated primary race between two stellar candidates.  Sadly, they managed to schedule both rallies for exactly the same time last night, but twenty miles apart.  My plans were foiled -- I had to pick one and only one.

Being a supporter of Obama's, I picked his rally, even though it was far less convenient.  The venue for Obama was the Verizon Wireless Amphitheater, far out on the northeast side.  Driving all the way across town at rush hour was not appealing, but the rarity of the moment won out, and I put up with it.

I was amazed at the number of volunteers helping out -- hawking t-shirts and buttons, handing out "tickets" and pens (the price of admission was your contact information), and, mostly, seeking to sign up additional volunteers.

I tried to get some pictures, but was not quite close enough to get decent ones.  Darn those big crowds!  The Express-News quotes a crowd size of about 8,000 people, and that strikes me as roughly correct.  It was by far the largest political rally I've been to -- perhaps too large to be an ideal rally, as it is difficult to fully engage those who are far away physically from the speakers and the candidate.  And I had no prayer of getting up close enough at the end to shake the candidate's hand, as I had managed to do at the John Kerry rally in March 2004 and the Bill Clinton rally for Ciro Rodriguez in 2006.

Still, it appears a good time was had by all.  I am sorry I won't be able to attend a Hillary Clinton rally, though.  Any chance she'll be back before Tuesday seems quite slim.  And at this point, I have to admit that I am ready for this primary season to be over after that. 

February 18, 2008

Obama, Chicago, and Harold Washington

My political roots are in the Chicago of the 1980s, the interregnum between the Mayor Daleys when racial politics threatened to tear apart the city.  National politics -- Reagan, Iran-Contra, etc -- flew at the edge of my political radar, but I was extremely attentive to the ongoing saga of Chicago city politics.  Harold Washington, Chicago's mayor from 1983 through 1987, was my first and strongest political icon.  I was, and remain, extremely proud that the very first vote I cast in my life was for his re-election in the mayoral campaign of 1987.  Washington's substantial victory that year -- after squeaking to victory in 1983 against a previously unknown Republican, whose late surge to near victory was driven by racist fears of a black mayor by much of the white population of Chicago -- represented to me the defeat of the forces of racial divisiveness.

My formative years under the spell of Harold Washington's anti-machine, reformist, and racially unifying administration may help explain my affinity towards Barack Obama, whose career began in that same place and time.  I was reminded of all this by a recent article in Salon by Edward McClelland, which is a very interesting look at Chicago's, and Harold Washington's, influence upon Obama during those years. 

Here is an excerpt:

Ironically, Chicago became the political capital of black America because it was so racist. For most of the 20th century, it was the most segregated city in America. Blacks used to have a saying: "In the South, the white man doesn't care how close you get, as long as you don't get too high; in the North, he doesn't care how high you get, as long as you don't get too close." During the Great Migration, the refugees who rode up from Mississippi on the Illinois Central Railroad were crowded into the Black Belt, the South Side ghetto portrayed in Richard Wright's "Native Son." Because the black population was so concentrated, white politicians couldn't gerrymander it out of a congressional seat. One of De Priest's successors, William Dawson, was the most powerful black politician in America. He helped boot out the predecessor to Mayor Richard J. Daley, the current mayor's father, who bossed Chicago from 1955 to 1976. In return, Daley's machine rewarded Dawson with control of the entire South Side.

The politician who truly set the stage for Obama's rise was also a South Side congressman: Harold Washington, who was elected mayor of Chicago in 1983, beating two white opponents in the Democratic primary -- incumbent Mayor Jane Byrne and future Mayor Richard M. Daley. In the general election, the difference between Washington and his Republican opponent was black and white -- and nothing else. When Washington campaigned at a church in a Polish neighborhood, he was greeted with the grafitto "Die, Nigger, Die."

In New York, Obama read about Washington's victory and wrote to City Hall, asking for a job. He never heard back, but he made it to Chicago just months after Washington took office. In his memoir "Dreams From My Father," he wrote about walking into a barbershop and seeing the new mayor's picture on the wall. (It's probably still there. To this day, Washington's image is as revered by South Side blacks as St. Anthony of Padua's is by Italian Catholics.) The old men, who'd suffered a lifetime of slights by white mayors, saw in Washington a sign that the black community had finally arrived as a citywide power. Blacks may have run things in their own neighborhoods, but they were still crammed into dreary housing projects, and they sent their children to overcrowded schools -- while white schools just across the color line sat half empty. And of course, the big political jobs -- the state's attorney, the County Board president, the mayor -- had always been controlled by the Irish.

"Before Harold," the barber said, "seemed like we'd always be second-class citizens."

After too many triple cheeseburgers and deep-dish pizzas, Washington dropped dead of a heart attack in his second term. But the confidence he instilled in black leaders became a permanent factor in Chicago politics. His success inspired Jesse Jackson to run for president in 1984, which in turn inspired Obama, who was impressed to see a black man on the same stage as Walter Mondale and Gary Hart. Washington also strengthened the community organizations in which Obama was cutting his teeth, says Ransom. Obama's Project Vote, which put him on the local political map, was a successor to the South Side voter registration drive that made Washington's election possible.

"Everybody owes something to Harold Washington, because that was something they never thought could happen," Ransom says. "If Harold can be mayor, what can't we do? Obama talks about the audacity of hope. That audacity has grown into the notion that a black man can be president of the United States."

Before Washington, a black Chicagoan pol's highest aspiration was U.S. representative. After Washington, it became senator, and finally, president. Plenty of other cities have had black mayors -- Detroit, Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, New York, Los Angeles, Cleveland, Baltimore -- but in none of those places have blacks achieved as much statewide political success. Chicago has two unique advantages, says political consultant Don Rose. First, it's in Cook County, which contains nearly half of Illinois' voters. Second, the local Democratic Party is a countywide organization. After Chicago's Carol Moseley Braun beat two white men to win the 1992 Democratic Senate primary, precinct captains in white Chicago neighborhoods and the suburbs whipped up votes for her in the general election.

"They had to go out and sell the black person to demonstrate that the party was still open," says Rose, who sees "direct links" from Washington to Moseley Braun to Obama.

"It was a hard-fought thing. If you use Harold Washington's election as the pivot point, what you begin to see is black politicians making challenges to the regular organizations, and then the organizations having to support them."

 

For much more on the the tumultuous, transformative, years of Harold Washington's tenure in Chicago, listen to a great program from Ira Glass' This American Life, that was first aired in 1997 on the 10th anniversary of Washington's death.

By the way, on that website, I learned that the Washington-Obama connection is embodied in David Axelrod, "a political advisor to Harold Washington during Washington's second mayoral race and who is also chief political and media advisor to Illinois Senator (and Presidential candidate) Barack Obama."

February 06, 2008

Super Tuesday -- difference in total votes less than half a percent

Not quite all the votes have been counted yet, but the vast majority have been (including 93% in California), so I decided to quickly tally up the total votes for Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama yesterday to see if either managed to satisfy my arbitrary criterion for a "winner".  Remember, that arbitrary criterion was a margin in the total number of votes of around 4%.

The results so far (8:40 AM CST), not including Alaska, which I only saw delegate totals for (but it's a small state so won't throw things off by too much):

Hillary Clinton   7.286 million votes
Barack Obama   7.242 million votes

That's a difference of 45,000 votes out of 14.5 million -- less than a third of a percent.

So Super Tuesday, the first near-national primary, was essentially a tie.

February 04, 2008

The 'Real Action' cometh - on the verge of Super Tuesday

Well, the time has come at last, after a very long month.  The preliminaries are over -- Super Tuesday is tomorrow.  This time, believe the hype.

And while I aligned myself with Barack Obama several weeks back, I've tried not to write much about the primaries as I didn't want to contribute to the divisiveness that, at times, threatened to spiral out of control. Fortunately, the candidates helped rein that back in over the last couple weeks.

As we all should have learned by now, don't take polls too literally.  When the candidates (the Democratic ones, at least) are both of such high quality and there is no dramatic ideological difference, it is natural for people to make up their minds -- even change their minds -- at the last minute.  This is all the more true since the 15% of Democrats who were supporting John Edwards have had to pick someone else in the last week.

But if we do take the polls seriously, it appears Hillary Clinton is still clinging to a small, but non-negligible, national lead over Obama.  While it doesn't appear likely either will have an unobstructed path to the nomination after tomorrow, one could still take a clear and obvious lead. 

I have settled on my own criterion for such a "victory" tomorrow:  a margin in total number of votes greater than some arbitrary threshhold, say 4%.  It is the margin in total votes that, I feel, will be more indicative of how the rest of the primary season will play out.  On the other hand, I definitely will be paying attention to who wins individual closely-contested states, such as California, Missouri, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Georgia, etc.  After all, winning states is the object of the general election, so one of the top criteria for the eventual Democratic nominee should be how well that person is at winning states.

And while there is some speculation that a long nomination battle harms the Democratic party, I believe quite the opposite -- as long as the divisiveness is kept in check, as it now appears to be.  If John McCain seals the GOP nomination tomorrow or soon thereafter (despite not yet having been able to win more than 37% in any state so far) and Clinton and Obama continue to battle for another month or more, the Democrats will steal all the media attention for many weeks.  And even if the nomination isn't settled until April or May, there are still several months after that to prepare for the conventions and the general election.  Plus, if the Democrats don't have a nominee yet, the GOP cannot properly focus their vicious slanders.

Barring an unexpected decisive result tomorrow, I am looking forward to being able to cast a meaningful vote myself come March 4 when Texas finally votes.

January 04, 2008

The Iowa effect

The hype surrounding the Iowa caucuses went from high to ridiculous last night.  It is even becoming hard for me to resist, particularly since my preferred candidate is the beneficiary.  Yet Obama supporters should not get overconfident, as many more, and much bigger states are still to come.  Things can easily end up very different than they appear right now.  I still believe the real decision point will be on Feb 5 and not before.  There is no reason for Edwards or Clinton supporters to even think of giving up before then, and not even reason to get discouraged.

With the much greater Democratic turnout than in any previous Iowa caucus, some of my concerns about the caucus system were alleviated.  Even still, the number of caucus voters was much smaller than the number of people who will be voting in November, and a small fraction of the total voting age population of the state. 

As Kevin Drum pointed out last night, "It's funny how sometimes you have to wait and see how you actually react to something to know how you're going to react to something."  In this sense, this first official voting of the primary season will likely end up very meaningful to many of us after all, in giving us a significant push towards or away from certain candidates.  It's impossible not to pay attention to that, as it happens inside our own heads. So I overstated things in my previous post.  The immediate results do not matter, but the effect they have on the rest of us is quite real and important.

In Drum's case, the effect seems to have -- temporarily, at least -- knocked him out of his long-held, vague anti-Obama attitude.  In my case, it confirmed that I am an Obama supporter -- a direction I had already been headed strongly in but hadn't fully arrived at.  It also helped me realize that I would be satisfied without Hillary Clinton as the nominee, and so am certainly not in her camp despite my positive feelings about her.

As for Edwards, I would be happy with him as the nominee, yet I feel Obama is a stronger candidate with a much higher upside for the long term.  So I am hoping to see Obama come out on top when the "real action" starts on February 5.

April 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Blogads


Search

  • Google

    Search Web
    Search this blog