Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 08/2004

Texas BlogWire

« Lowering the bar for Constitutional amendments | Main | "Extremism in pursuit of vice" »

June 23, 2005

Comments

jimmyk

You seem to be an apologist for the court. Many of your fellow liberals do not agree with taking of private property. It's time to wake up.

Peter

I think it is a common misunderstanding that this was a case about the taking of private property. It was not. Eminent domain has been the law of the land, written into the Constitution from virtually the very start. As I said above, it was about who gets to define "public use."

For those who don't like judges making new law and also don't like the taking of private property, even with just compensation and for "public use", they need to change the Constitution by the official process rather than have Scalia et al. do it for them.

coturnix

I found interesting the analysis by Publius at Legal Fiction (http://lawandpolitics.blogspot.com).

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

December 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

Blogads