Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 08/2004

Texas BlogWire

« Tangled Bank 49 | Main | Pileated v. Ivory-billed: Sibley's story »

March 18, 2006



I wouldn't say I've given up. My point is just that from a scientific point of view, the alternate possibility (the null hypothesis), that it is a Pileated Woodpecker, cannot be conclusively ruled out. Even if Sibley's argument was less persuasive than Fitzpatrick's, the burden of real, verifiable proof is on Fitzpatrick to disprove the null hypothesis.


Sorry to misinterpret your position, Nuthatch.

While Fitzpatrick do have that burden, of course, they already have put together a compelling case. By not engaging that case in full, arguing for or against its strengths and weaknesses, Sibley appears to be (to put it perhaps a bit harshly) cheating.

We'll all know soon enough, though.


I can't believe how polarizing the debate has become over whether this bird still lives. Check out this intense, and entertaining, flame war! The Daily Green

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

December 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31