Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 08/2004

Texas BlogWire

« Texas water war? The renewed fight over the Edwards aquifer | Main | State parks: Gov. Perry tries to slow the full funding train »

January 12, 2007

Comments

boadicea

Blaming bloggers for a lack of spine in the legislature seems to me to be a stretch.

54 Dems held together for the procedural vote. All the Pitts side had to do was come up with enough to protect the voting secrecy, and they couldn't do that.

Now, the Iscariot Caucus sold out. Plain and simple.

What's yet to be revealed is for what and to whose benefit.

It's possible they can redeem themselves, if they get tangible, concrete results for their districts and the rest of Texas-and I don't just mean pork.

But that's not something that's going to happen in advance of delivery.

Peter

Thanks for the comment, boadicea -- and the welcome on Texas Kaos.

I'm still unclear on how the choice of one Republican over another can be considered selling out. As unseemly as Craddick is, would Pitts really have been much better in practice? The character of the GOP caucus is the same either way, and they run the show.

If it had been a Democrat running for speaker against Craddick, the choice would have been crystal clear. But this case was not, in my opinion.

John cobarruvias

Yea. Thats the ticket. Blame the bloggers for not having any balls.

What a concept.

Craddick is as corrupt as Tom DeLay. The only people you can blame are those who voted for this corruption.

If you cant have any balls and admit you dont have any balls, at least dont blame bloggers.

Peter

John, I certainly did not blame anyone for "not having any balls." All I said was that the tactics of some were, in my opinion, a mistake.

To gain something from this loss, I am hoping that we can figure out why it happened, despite reported extremely wide dissatisfaction with Craddick. The 15 Craddick Dems should not have been the margin, as they never were dissatisfied apparently. The explanation lies somewhere in the sixty-some GOPers who stuck with Craddick rather than pick another of their party despite the misgivings of many of them. My post above is a plausible suggestion for why this happened.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

December 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

Blogads